Anomalious Trends in Electromagnetic As Earthquake Precursors With Related Parameters at the Port Ratu Observatory

Angga Setiyo Prayogo, Bambang Sunardi


Research on electromagnetic anomalies as earthquake precursor was performed in many places and time. Pelabuhan Ratu Observatory. For validation, correlation between anomaly value and time length with earthquake that recorded at Pelabuhan Ratu Geophysical Observatory and have electromagnetic anomaly. Goals of this research were analyze correlation between anomaly pattern value and time length to earthquake magnitud and Rhypo. Data processed by polarization ratio and impedance of electromagnetic at ultra low frequency spectrum, the correlation method using regression and physical analysis between parameter. Data that used was electromagnetic and earthquake data that recorded and perceived at geophysical observatories of Pelabuhan Ratu. Results of electromagnetic anomaly value with magnetic polarization ratio was varies in 0.1 until 9.5, and also time length between 4 until 39 days before earthquake. Value of anomaly with impedance method was varies in 3.01 until 16.1, and also time length between 4 until 32 days before earthquake. In conclusion, known that trend correlation of the appearance of anomalous values and ranges of magnitude and distance Rhypo with magnetic polarization method showed a positive correlation, whereas a negative correlation with the impedance method. Negative correlation also obtained on relationship between Rhypoand magnitude of the span of time and the value of the polarization anomaly



Electromagnetic; Earthquake Precursor; Correlation

Full Text:



Yumoto, K. and The MAGDAS Group. (2009), MAGDAS Project and Its Application for Earthquake Prediction, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Integration of Geophysical Parameter as a Set of Large Earthquake Precursors, Research and Development Center BMG, Jakarta.

Nurdiyanto, B., et al., (2011), Integration of Geophysical Parameter Observation in the Earthquake Predictability, JCM2011-Nopember, Proceedings of the 36th HAGI and 40th IAGI Anual Convention and Exhibition, Makasar.

Yumoto, K., S. Ikemoto, M.G. Cardinal, H. Hayakawa, K. Hattori, J.Y Liu, S. Saroso, M. Ruhimat, M. Husni, D.S. Widarto, E. Ramos, D. McNamara, R.E. Otadoy, G. Yumul, R. Ebora, and N. Servdano, (2009), A new ULF wave analysis for Seismo-Electromagnetics using CPMN/MAGDAS data. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 34(2009): 360-366.

Pulinets, S. dan D. Ouzonov, (2011), Litosphere – Atmosphere – Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) model a unified concept for earthquake precursors validation. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 41. 371-382.

Dobrovolsky, I.P., Zubkov, S.I., & Miachkin, V.I. (1979), Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones. Pure and Applied Geophysics 117(5): 1025-1044.

Hayakawa, M., Kawate R., Molchanov O.A., dan Yumoto K. (1996), Result of Ultra-Low Frequency Magnetic Field Measurements during the Guam Earthquake of 8 augustus 1993, Geophysical Research Lett. 23(3):241-244

WDC (World Data Center) for Geo-magnetic (2012),, accessed at November 9th 201418.32.

Gonzales, W.D., J.A Joselyn, Y. Kamide, H.W. Kroehl, G. Rostoker, B.T. Tsurutani, V.M. Vasyliunas (1994), What is a Geomagnetic Storm? J. Geophys, Res 99, 5571.

Xuemin, Z. dan S. Xuhui, (2011), Electromagnetic Anomalies around the Wenchuan Earthquake and Their Relationship with Earthquake Preparation, International Journal of Geophysics, Vol. 2011(2011), Article ID 904132, 8 pages.

Hattori, K. (2007), ULF Electromagnetic Changes Possibly Associated with Crustal Activity, Proceding: Electromagnetics in Seismic and Volcanic Areas, Bilateral Seminar Italy-Japan, July 25-27, 2007 Chiba Japan, Edited by Katsumi Hattori and Luciano Telesca: 41-56.

Chen, Z., P.Ch. Ivanov, K.Hu. H.E Stanley (2002), Effect of nonstationarities on detrended fluctuation analysis, Phys. Rev. E 65, 041107.

Rikitake, Tsuneji (2003), Earthquake Prediction, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, from Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (Third edition), Elsevier: 743-760.



  • There are currently no refbacks.